Snapshot Testing: Should You Go For It in 2026?

Snapshot Testing: Should You Go For It in 2026?

Manual visual testing alone worked when release cycles were slow and interfaces were simple. That no longer holds true.

Modern teams ship UI changes daily across devices, browsers, and screen sizes, making visual checks time-consuming and easy to miss. Studies consistently show that a large share of production bugs are visual or UI-related, yet many still slip past functional tests.

Automated visual testing emerged to close this gap, and snapshot testing quickly became one of its most adopted approaches. By capturing a “known good” UI state and comparing it against future changes, snapshot tests scale visual coverage without manual effort.

Today, snapshot testing is built into popular test frameworks and CI pipelines, helping teams catch unintended UI changes early while keeping test execution fast.

This article explores snapshot testing through a 2026 lens. It explains how snapshot testing works, where it fits best in modern testing strategies, and the tools commonly used today.

What is Snapshot Testing?

Snapshot testing is a testing technique that captures the output of a UI component and stores it as a reference, called a snapshot. This snapshot represents the expected state of the component at a specific point in time. Future test runs compare the current output against this stored version to detect changes.

This visual comparison test usually happens at the code or rendered markup level rather than pixel by pixel. If the output differs, the test fails and prompts a review. Teams can then decide whether the change is expected and update the snapshot, or treat it as a regression.

This approach makes snapshot testing especially popular in automated UI workflows. It provides fast feedback on UI changes without requiring manual visual UI testing for every update, which is why many teams treat it as a baseline layer in automated visual testing setups.

How Does Snapshot Testing Work?

Snapshot testing compares the current output of a UI component against a previously approved version. It helps teams quickly detect unintended changes without relying on manual visual checks.

Step 1: Render the Component: The component is rendered in a controlled test environment. Its output, such as JSX, HTML, or a serialized structure, is captured during the test run.

Step 2: Create the Snapshot: The initial output is saved as a snapshot file. This snapshot represents the expected, approved state of the component. In the future, all other snapshots are compared against this approved state.

Step 3: Compare on Every Test Run: On subsequent runs, the component is rendered again and compared against the stored snapshot. Any difference causes the test to fail and highlights what changed. Depending on the visual regression testing tool, they might have added capabilities of reviewing dynamic content to minimize false positives.

Step 4: Review and Update When Needed: Developers review the reported differences to confirm whether the change is intentional. Approved updates replace the old snapshot and are committed with the code.

What Are The Highlights of Snapshot Testing?

Snapshot testing remains popular because it balances speed, coverage, and simplicity. It gives teams a structured way to track UI changes while keeping automation lightweight and developer-friendly.

• Quick Detection of UI Changes: Snapshot tests surface differences as soon as code changes are introduced. Even small updates to structure or content are flagged, which helps teams review UI impact early instead of discovering issues during late-stage testing.
• Strong Fit for Component-Driven Development: Teams building UI as reusable components benefit the most from snapshot testing. With component testing, each component can be validated in isolation, making it easier to understand what changed and where.
• Minimal Tooling and Setup Effort: Most snapshot testing tools are bundled into popular test frameworks. This reduces onboarding friction and allows teams to add visual checks without restructuring existing test suites.
• Easy Adoption Across Engineering Teams: Developers can write and review snapshot tests using familiar workflows. Since snapshots live alongside code, they become part of the normal development and review process.
• CI-Friendly and Scalable: Snapshot tests run quickly and work well in continuous integration pipelines. They scale as the test suite grows without significantly increasing build times.
• Clear Diffs for Review and Approval: When a snapshot changes, tools highlight exactly what differs from the previous version. This makes reviews more focused and helps teams decide whether changes are intentional or accidental.
• Supports Design System Stability: Snapshot testing helps track changes in shared components and design systems. Unexpected updates to typography, spacing, or structure are caught before they affect multiple pages.
• Encourages Consistent UI Evolution: By requiring explicit approval for UI changes, snapshot testing creates a record of how interfaces evolve. This promotes deliberate design decisions rather than silent or accidental UI drift.

Fun Fact: Airbnb’s iOS app has approximately 30,000 snapshot tests, about three times the number of unit tests in that codebase, and companies like Spotify and Shopify also report 1,000+ snapshot tests each.

Tools For Snapshot Testing

Snapshot testing is supported by a wide range of tools, from dedicated visual testing software to testing frameworks with built-in snapshot capabilities. Each tool approaches snapshots slightly differently, some focus on pixel-level visuals, while others compare rendered output or component structure.

Choosing the right tool depends on how closely you want to track visual changes, how your tests run in CI, and how much manual review your team can handle.

Here are a few standout visual testing tools that deliver with special snapshot capabilities:

BrowserStack Percy

BrowserStack Percy is an automated visual testing tool that helps teams catch UI regressions and visual bugs before changes reach users. Rather than relying solely on code assertions or manual checks, Percy captures a snapshot of your UI’s rendered output and compares it to previously approved baselines.

What sets Percy apart is its snapshot stabilization and AI-enhanced review capabilities. Snapshot stabilization ‘freezes’ animations and dynamic areas so that moving content does not lead to misleading diffs, keeping test results consistent and reducing false alerts.

The overall compounded impact of AI in Percy is transformation and drastic. You’re getting your money’s worth and at the end of the day, you’re net positive on the investment.

Zohar Liran

Director, Head of Engineering, Construction Platform at Autodesk

An AI-driven Visual Review Agent goes further by filtering out noise, focusing on meaningful visual shifts, and providing natural-language summaries that can speed up visual review cycles by several times.

These advances help teams focus on real visual regressions while avoiding distraction from insignificant pixel changes.

Pricing: Percy offers tiered pricing that aligns with how teams scale visual testing based on screenshots, the core unit of usage in Percy’s model. Each plan includes unlimited users and projects, but the number of screenshots you can capture per month varies by plan. Screenshots beyond your included quota are charged as overage.

• Free plan: Includes up to 5,000 screenshots per month with unlimited users and projects.
• Paid plans: Start at higher screenshot limits (for example, 25,000+ screenshots per month) and scale based on usage.
• Enterprise plans: Custom screenshot quotas and pricing for large teams with advanced support needs.

Thinking about scaling with snapshots?

Percy lets you run snapshot tests in parallel with separate baselines, factoring 1000+ snapshots across 50,000+ real devices and browsers.

• Advanced Snapshot Stabilization
• Visual AI Reviews
• Parallel Snapshot Execution
• Web & Mobile Test Coverage

Talk to an Expert Learn more

Applitools Eyes

Applitools is a visual AI testing platform that goes beyond basic snapshot comparison to detect visual regressions using machine learning. Its Visual AI analyzes full screens rather than simple DOM or markup snapshots and is especially strong at handling dynamic content and layout differences that traditional snapshot tools struggle with.

While powerful, this focus on AI-driven visual validation makes it less lightweight and more costly than Percy for teams that only need basic snapshot regression checks.

Key Features of Applitools Eyes:

• Visual AI Baselines: Compares UI snapshots using AI that detects meaningful visual changes instead of relying on simple pixel diffs, reducing noise from insignificant shifts.
• Dynamic Content Handling: Intelligent recognition of dynamic regions (e.g., timestamps, data feeds) to avoid false positives common in static snapshot tests.
• Framework Integrations: Works with many test frameworks (Selenium, Cypress, Playwright) and languages, letting existing tests capture and validate UI state.
• Cross-Device & Ultrafast Grid: Executes visual comparisons across browsers and devices in parallel, speeding up wide coverage.

Limitations of Applitools Eyes:

• Higher Cost: Entry plans for visual AI testing are significantly more expensive than simpler snapshot tools, which can be a barrier for smaller teams.
• Complex Setup: Configuring advanced visual AI workflows often requires more time and expertise compared to lightweight snapshot setups.
• Overkill for Component-Only Needs: Enterprise-grade features may be unnecessary if all you need is basic component snapshot regression.
• Opaque Pricing Details: While pricing tiers exist, many enterprise costs require sales engagement rather than simple transparent numbers.
• Maintenance Effort: Because tests cover more sophisticated visual contexts, teams may spend more time refining baselines and AI rules.

Pricing: Applitools uses a tiered, usage-based pricing model centered around “test units” or checkpoints (e.g., pages or components). It offers free trials and free tiers for limited use. Paid plans start around $699–$969 per month depending on how many pages/components you validate and whether you need cross-device or enterprise features.

Jest

Jest is a widely used JavaScript testing framework with built-in snapshot testing. It captures the rendered output of components and stores it in .snap files that are versioned with your code. Jest’s snapshot support is easy to adopt and excellent for simple component state validation, making it a go-to for many React and DOM-focused projects.

Compared with Percy’s visual-centric snapshot stabilization and cross-environment comparisons, Jest’s snapshot testing is lighter and centered on code structure rather than full UI visuals.

Key Features of Jest:

• Inline snapshot support: Lets you embed snapshots directly in test files for easier tracking and review alongside test logic.
• Automatic snapshot generation: Runs toMatchSnapshot() to create and update snapshot files with minimal configuration.
• Fast execution: Runs tests in parallel and caches results to keep snapshot suites efficient.
• Integration with other Jest APIs: Works with mocks, timers, and other test utilities to help create richer snapshot scenarios.

Limitations of Jest:

• Fragile for frequent changes: UI or markup updates often require repeated snapshot updates, increasing noise.
• Large snapshots can be unwieldy: Big snapshot files are hard to scan and maintain, reducing usefulness.
• Limited visual context: Focuses on markup structure, not pixel-accurate visuals.
• No built-in cross-browser snapshot comparisons: Doesn’t validate rendering across different browsers.
• Need complementary tests: Snapshot tests alone don’t cover behavior or interaction.

Pricing: Jest is open-source and free, with no usage limits beyond your project’s test scope.

Mocha

Mocha is a flexible JavaScript test framework that doesn’t include snapshot testing natively. Unlike Percy or Jest, Mocha leaves snapshot capabilities to external libraries such as chai-snapshot or jest-specific-snapshot.

While it can be adapted for simple snapshot workflows, it’s not optimized for them out of the box. Teams that choose Mocha often combine it with other tools rather than rely on it for snapshot testing alone.

Key Features of Mocha:

• Highly customizable: Works with chosen assertion and utility libraries.
• Flexible test structure: Supports asynchronous tests and multiple reporters.
• Wide ecosystem support: Integrates with many plugins and tools.

Limitations of Mocha:

• No native snapshot support: Requires extra libraries to enable snapshot tests.
• More setup overhead: Assembling the right stack (assertions, test runner) takes work.
• Snapshot tooling inconsistency: Third-party snapshot plugins vary in maintenance and features.
• Less focus on component UI: Better suited for backend logic than UI snapshot workflows.
• Steeper learning curve: The flexibility comes with complexity for new teams.

Pricing: Mocha itself is free and open-source, plugins for snapshot support are similarly free.

Storybook

Storybook visual regression testing is a UI component explorer that can also drive snapshot testing via its test-runner or integrations with test frameworks like Jest. It turns UI stories into testable snapshots of rendered markup, serving as foundations for validating component states.

Key Features of Storybook:

• Story-driven snapshots: Uses component stories to generate snapshot tests automatically.
• Portable Stories API: Reuses stories in snapshot test environments like Jest or Vitest.
• Customizable snapshot serialization: Allows configuration of how markup is serialized for snapshots.
• Integration with test tools: Plays nicely with Jest and Playwright via the test-runner.

Limitations of Storybook:

• Markup-only snapshot focus: Doesn’t provide pixel-level or cross-browser visual diffs out of the box.
• Deprecated older addons: Legacy snapshot tooling (e.g., Storyshots) is no longer supported.
• Requires testing setup: Needs additional configuration or external test runners.
• No built-in CI visual review: Storybook alone doesn’t offer centralized snapshot review workflows.
• Not optimized for large snapshot suites: Large story libraries may generate many files to maintain.

Pricing: Storybook itself is open-source and free. Enterprise or cloud services tied to testing (e.g., Chromatic) are separate.

The Drawbacks of Going With Snapshot Testing

Snapshot testing can be useful, but it also introduces trade-offs that teams need to understand before relying on it too heavily. Many of these challenges become more visible as applications grow and UI changes become more frequent.

• High Maintenance as UI Evolves: Snapshot tests tend to break whenever markup or component structure changes, even if the update is intentional. Teams often spend time approving and updating snapshots, which can reduce their long-term value.
• Limited Visual Accuracy: Most snapshot tests compare serialized output or markup, not actual rendered pixels. This means layout issues, spacing problems, or styling differences across browsers may go undetected.
• Easy to Approve Without Review: Snapshot failures are often resolved by blindly updating snapshots. When this becomes routine, tests stop acting as safeguards and turn into a checkbox exercise.
• Poor Signal for Large Snapshots: Large snapshot files are hard to read and review meaningfully. When too much output changes at once, it becomes difficult to identify what actually matters.
• Not Ideal for Cross-Browser Coverage: Snapshot testing typically runs in a single rendering environment. Differences caused by browser engines, device sizes, or fonts are usually outside its scope.
• Requires Complementary Testing: Snapshot tests do not validate behavior, interactions, or accessibility. They work best when paired with functional tests and, where needed, full visual regression testing.

Percy Guarantees 3× Faster UI Reviews

Reviews 1000+ snapshots together instantly, fast tracking your review sessions and production timelines.

Try Percy

Conclusion

Snapshot testing has become a cornerstone of modern automated visual testing, offering fast feedback on UI changes with minimal setup. It works particularly well for component-driven development, helping teams catch unintended changes early and maintain consistency across code updates.

However, snapshot testing is not a silver bullet. It requires ongoing maintenance, careful review, and complementary testing to ensure meaningful coverage. While tools like Percy enhance snapshots with stabilization and AI-driven review, simpler frameworks like Jest or Storybook offer lightweight, code-focused alternatives. Choosing the right approach depends on your project size, UI complexity, and team workflow.

When used thoughtfully, snapshot testing can save time, reduce regression risk, and support a more efficient development cycle, making it a practical addition to any modern testing strategy.